Canada vs Republic of Moldova: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Canada
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Canada currently reports 518,342 1000 USD against 13,800 1000 USD in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 504,542 1000 USD.
That makes Canada's figure about 37.6 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 8th and Republic of Moldova ranks 5th of 187 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 136,013 1000 USD | 354.99 1000 USD | 135,658 1000 USD | Canada |
| 2010s | 299,879 1000 USD | 8,769 1000 USD | 291,110 1000 USD | Canada |
| 2020s | 518,845 1000 USD | 18,541 1000 USD | 500,304 1000 USD | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Canada or Republic of Moldova?
- Canada, at 518,342 1000 USD against 13,800 1000 USD in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Canada and Republic of Moldova?
- 504,542 1000 USD, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Republic of Moldova?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Republic of Moldova rank globally for urea — import value?
- Canada ranks 8th and Republic of Moldova ranks 5th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf