Congo vs Cuba: Urea — Import value

Congo
1,447 1000 USD
in 2024
Cuba
1,451 1000 USD
in 2024
Congo rank
135th
Cuba rank
134th

Urea — Import value over time

  • Congo
  • Cuba
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k200220132024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 1,451 1000 USD against 1,447 1000 USD in Congo, a difference of 4 1000 USD.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Cuba ahead.

Congo ranks 135th and Cuba ranks 134th of 200 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Cuba Difference Ahead
2000s 165.44 1000 USD 6,204 1000 USD 6,039 1000 USD Cuba
2010s 243.32 1000 USD 21,841 1000 USD 21,598 1000 USD Cuba
2020s 1,567 1000 USD 4,099 1000 USD 2,532 1000 USD Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — import value, Congo or Cuba?
Cuba, at 1,451 1000 USD against 1,447 1000 USD in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in urea — import value between Congo and Cuba?
4 1000 USD, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Cuba?
18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
How do Congo and Cuba rank globally for urea — import value?
Congo ranks 135th and Cuba ranks 134th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 4,854 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf