Costa Rica vs Israel: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Costa Rica
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 49,838 1000 USD against 43,910 1000 USD in Costa Rica, a difference of 5,928 1000 USD.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 64th and Israel ranks 62nd of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Israel in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20,617 1000 USD | 15,791 1000 USD | 4,826 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 33,474 1000 USD | 26,431 1000 USD | 7,043 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 46,233 1000 USD | 56,140 1000 USD | 9,907 1000 USD | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Costa Rica or Israel?
- Israel, at 49,838 1000 USD against 43,910 1000 USD in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Costa Rica and Israel?
- 5,928 1000 USD, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Israel?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Israel rank globally for urea — import value?
- Costa Rica ranks 64th and Israel ranks 62nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf