Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Costa Rica
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 47,033 1000 USD against 43,910 1000 USD in Costa Rica, a difference of 3,123 1000 USD.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 63rd of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20,617 1000 USD | 7,087 1000 USD | 13,530 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 33,474 1000 USD | 22,487 1000 USD | 10,987 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 46,813 1000 USD | 56,611 1000 USD | 9,798 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Costa Rica or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 47,033 1000 USD against 43,910 1000 USD in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
- 3,123 1000 USD, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Zimbabwe rank globally for urea — import value?
- Costa Rica ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 63rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf