El Salvador vs Kazakhstan: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- El Salvador
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 17,379 1000 USD against 15,625 1000 USD in El Salvador, a difference of 1,754 1000 USD.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 85th and Kazakhstan ranks 82nd of 200 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,726 1000 USD | 737.04 1000 USD | 9,989 1000 USD | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 17,192 1000 USD | 6,116 1000 USD | 11,075 1000 USD | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 19,559 1000 USD | 18,412 1000 USD | 1,147 1000 USD | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, El Salvador or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 17,379 1000 USD against 15,625 1000 USD in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between El Salvador and Kazakhstan?
- 1,754 1000 USD, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kazakhstan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Kazakhstan rank globally for urea — import value?
- El Salvador ranks 85th and Kazakhstan ranks 82nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf