El Salvador vs Latvia: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- El Salvador
- Latvia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 15,625 1000 USD against 13,220 1000 USD in Latvia, a difference of 2,405 1000 USD.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 81st and Latvia ranks 84th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,726 1000 USD | 2,773 1000 USD | 7,953 1000 USD | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 17,192 1000 USD | 9,893 1000 USD | 7,299 1000 USD | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 19,559 1000 USD | 25,624 1000 USD | 6,066 1000 USD | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, El Salvador or Latvia?
- El Salvador, at 15,625 1000 USD against 13,220 1000 USD in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between El Salvador and Latvia?
- 2,405 1000 USD, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Latvia rank globally for urea — import value?
- El Salvador ranks 81st and Latvia ranks 84th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf