Equatorial Guinea vs Maldives: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Maldives
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 28.62 1000 USD against 28 1000 USD in Maldives, a difference of 0.62 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 175th and Maldives ranks 176th of 200 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.22 1000 USD | 7.45 1000 USD | 5.77 1000 USD | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 65.77 1000 USD | 12.87 1000 USD | 52.9 1000 USD | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 31.5 1000 USD | 26.02 1000 USD | 5.48 1000 USD | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Equatorial Guinea or Maldives?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 28.62 1000 USD against 28 1000 USD in Maldives as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Equatorial Guinea and Maldives?
- 0.62 1000 USD, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Maldives?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Maldives rank globally for urea — import value?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 175th and Maldives ranks 176th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf