Equatorial Guinea vs Tonga: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 38.14 1000 USD against 28.62 1000 USD in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 9.52 1000 USD.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.3 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Tonga ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 175th and Tonga ranks 173rd of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.99 1000 USD | 24.81 1000 USD | 11.82 1000 USD | Tonga |
| 2010s | 65.77 1000 USD | 54.08 1000 USD | 11.69 1000 USD | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 31.5 1000 USD | 50.04 1000 USD | 18.54 1000 USD | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Equatorial Guinea or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 38.14 1000 USD against 28.62 1000 USD in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Equatorial Guinea and Tonga?
- 9.52 1000 USD, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Tonga?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Tonga rank globally for urea — import value?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 175th and Tonga ranks 173rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf