Eswatini vs North Macedonia: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Eswatini
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 8,991 1000 USD against 8,366 1000 USD in North Macedonia, a difference of 625 1000 USD.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 94th and North Macedonia ranks 96th of 187 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,707 1000 USD | 2,073 1000 USD | 3,634 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 6,056 1000 USD | 3,729 1000 USD | 2,327 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 8,549 1000 USD | 7,900 1000 USD | 649.91 1000 USD | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Eswatini or North Macedonia?
- Eswatini, at 8,991 1000 USD against 8,366 1000 USD in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Eswatini and North Macedonia?
- 625 1000 USD, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and North Macedonia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and North Macedonia rank globally for urea — import value?
- Eswatini ranks 94th and North Macedonia ranks 96th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf