Germany vs South Africa: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Germany
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 323,128 1000 USD against 185,964 1000 USD in Germany, a difference of 137,164 1000 USD.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.7 times Germany's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was South Africa ahead.
Germany ranks 24th and South Africa ranks 26th of 200 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 119,001 1000 USD | 153,384 1000 USD | 34,383 1000 USD | South Africa |
| 2010s | 184,259 1000 USD | 250,763 1000 USD | 66,504 1000 USD | South Africa |
| 2020s | 272,980 1000 USD | 392,977 1000 USD | 119,997 1000 USD | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Germany or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 323,128 1000 USD against 185,964 1000 USD in Germany as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Germany and South Africa?
- 137,164 1000 USD, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Germany and South Africa rank globally for urea — import value?
- Germany ranks 24th and South Africa ranks 26th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf