Iraq vs Papua New Guinea: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Iraq
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 14,364 1000 USD against 12,502 1000 USD in Iraq, a difference of 1,862 1000 USD.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Iraq's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Iraq ranks 85th and Papua New Guinea ranks 82nd of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 105.08 1000 USD | 1,186 1000 USD | 1,080 1000 USD | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 39,330 1000 USD | 5,312 1000 USD | 34,018 1000 USD | Iraq |
| 2020s | 38,506 1000 USD | 18,078 1000 USD | 20,427 1000 USD | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Iraq or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 14,364 1000 USD against 12,502 1000 USD in Iraq as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Iraq and Papua New Guinea?
- 1,862 1000 USD, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Papua New Guinea?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Iraq and Papua New Guinea rank globally for urea — import value?
- Iraq ranks 85th and Papua New Guinea ranks 82nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf