Italy vs Republic of Korea: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Italy
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Italy currently reports 358,638 1000 USD against 306,091 1000 USD in Republic of Korea, a difference of 52,547 1000 USD.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.2 times Republic of Korea's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 12th and Republic of Korea ranks 16th of 185 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 251,745 1000 USD | 179,489 1000 USD | 72,256 1000 USD | Italy |
| 2010s | 289,387 1000 USD | 246,349 1000 USD | 43,038 1000 USD | Italy |
| 2020s | 487,873 1000 USD | 394,733 1000 USD | 93,139 1000 USD | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Italy or Republic of Korea?
- Italy, at 358,638 1000 USD against 306,091 1000 USD in Republic of Korea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Italy and Republic of Korea?
- 52,547 1000 USD, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Republic of Korea?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Republic of Korea rank globally for urea — import value?
- Italy ranks 12th and Republic of Korea ranks 16th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf