Kyrgyzstan vs North Macedonia: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 8,514 1000 USD against 8,366 1000 USD in North Macedonia, a difference of 148 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 102nd and North Macedonia ranks 103rd of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,954 1000 USD | 2,073 1000 USD | 118.64 1000 USD | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 8,377 1000 USD | 3,729 1000 USD | 4,648 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 9,238 1000 USD | 7,993 1000 USD | 1,245 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Kyrgyzstan or North Macedonia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 8,514 1000 USD against 8,366 1000 USD in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Kyrgyzstan and North Macedonia?
- 148 1000 USD, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and North Macedonia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and North Macedonia rank globally for urea — import value?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 102nd and North Macedonia ranks 103rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf