Latvia vs Papua New Guinea: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Latvia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 14,364 1000 USD against 13,220 1000 USD in Latvia, a difference of 1,144 1000 USD.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 89th and Papua New Guinea ranks 86th of 200 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,773 1000 USD | 1,567 1000 USD | 1,207 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2010s | 9,893 1000 USD | 5,312 1000 USD | 4,581 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2020s | 25,624 1000 USD | 18,078 1000 USD | 7,546 1000 USD | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Latvia or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 14,364 1000 USD against 13,220 1000 USD in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Latvia and Papua New Guinea?
- 1,144 1000 USD, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Papua New Guinea?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for urea — import value?
- Latvia ranks 89th and Papua New Guinea ranks 86th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf