Libya vs North Macedonia: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Libya
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 8,366 1000 USD against 6,970 1000 USD in Libya, a difference of 1,396 1000 USD.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Libya ranks 106th and North Macedonia ranks 103rd of 200 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.99 1000 USD | 2,356 1000 USD | 2,346 1000 USD | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 1,938 1000 USD | 3,729 1000 USD | 1,791 1000 USD | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 3,159 1000 USD | 7,993 1000 USD | 4,834 1000 USD | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Libya or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 8,366 1000 USD against 6,970 1000 USD in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Libya and North Macedonia?
- 1,396 1000 USD, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and North Macedonia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Libya and North Macedonia rank globally for urea — import value?
- Libya ranks 106th and North Macedonia ranks 103rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf