Luxembourg vs Suriname: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Luxembourg
- Suriname
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 5,571 1000 USD against 5,012 1000 USD in Suriname, a difference of 559 1000 USD.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Suriname ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 111th and Suriname ranks 113th of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,698 1000 USD | 4,301 1000 USD | 1,603 1000 USD | Suriname |
| 2010s | 8,194 1000 USD | 4,193 1000 USD | 4,001 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 13,146 1000 USD | 6,990 1000 USD | 6,156 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Luxembourg or Suriname?
- Luxembourg, at 5,571 1000 USD against 5,012 1000 USD in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Luxembourg and Suriname?
- 559 1000 USD, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Suriname?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Suriname rank globally for urea — import value?
- Luxembourg ranks 111th and Suriname ranks 113th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf