Mexico vs Republic of Moldova: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Mexico
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 535,084 1000 USD against 13,800 1000 USD in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 521,284 1000 USD.
That makes Mexico's figure about 38.8 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 7th and Republic of Moldova ranks 5th of 187 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 329,220 1000 USD | 354.99 1000 USD | 328,866 1000 USD | Mexico |
| 2010s | 454,276 1000 USD | 8,769 1000 USD | 445,507 1000 USD | Mexico |
| 2020s | 604,007 1000 USD | 18,541 1000 USD | 585,466 1000 USD | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Mexico or Republic of Moldova?
- Mexico, at 535,084 1000 USD against 13,800 1000 USD in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Mexico and Republic of Moldova?
- 521,284 1000 USD, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Republic of Moldova?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Mexico and Republic of Moldova rank globally for urea — import value?
- Mexico ranks 7th and Republic of Moldova ranks 5th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf