Palau vs Sao Tome and Principe: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Palau
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 9.07 1000 USD against 5.69 1000 USD in Palau, a difference of 3.38 1000 USD.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.6 times Palau's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Palau ahead.
Palau ranks 174th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st of 187 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Palau averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Palau | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.53 1000 USD | 5.89 1000 USD | 0.6425 1000 USD | Palau |
| 2010s | 14.68 1000 USD | 15.95 1000 USD | 1.27 1000 USD | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Palau or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 9.07 1000 USD against 5.69 1000 USD in Palau as of 2023.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Palau and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 3.38 1000 USD, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Palau and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for urea — import value?
- Palau ranks 174th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf