Panama vs Papua New Guinea: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 14,364 1000 USD against 13,649 1000 USD in Panama, a difference of 715 1000 USD.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 88th and Papua New Guinea ranks 86th of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,251 1000 USD | 1,567 1000 USD | 6,684 1000 USD | Panama |
| 2010s | 9,616 1000 USD | 5,312 1000 USD | 4,304 1000 USD | Panama |
| 2020s | 15,956 1000 USD | 18,078 1000 USD | 2,122 1000 USD | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Panama or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 14,364 1000 USD against 13,649 1000 USD in Panama as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Panama and Papua New Guinea?
- 715 1000 USD, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Papua New Guinea?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Panama and Papua New Guinea rank globally for urea — import value?
- Panama ranks 88th and Papua New Guinea ranks 86th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf