South Sudan vs Turkmenistan: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- South Sudan
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 62.26 1000 USD against 52.65 1000 USD in Turkmenistan, a difference of 9.61 1000 USD.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 167th and Turkmenistan ranks 170th of 200 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 37.27 1000 USD | 70.14 1000 USD | 32.87 1000 USD | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 72 1000 USD | 30.39 1000 USD | 41.61 1000 USD | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, South Sudan or Turkmenistan?
- South Sudan, at 62.26 1000 USD against 52.65 1000 USD in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between South Sudan and Turkmenistan?
- 9.61 1000 USD, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Turkmenistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Turkmenistan rank globally for urea — import value?
- South Sudan ranks 167th and Turkmenistan ranks 170th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf