Saint Lucia vs Timor-Leste: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Saint Lucia
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 121.8 1000 USD against 76.65 1000 USD in Saint Lucia, a difference of 45.15 1000 USD.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.6 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Saint Lucia ranks 164th and Timor-Leste ranks 161st of 200 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.35 1000 USD | 8.36 1000 USD | 28.99 1000 USD | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 62.83 1000 USD | 39.34 1000 USD | 23.49 1000 USD | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 76.65 1000 USD | 62.1 1000 USD | 14.55 1000 USD | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Saint Lucia or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 121.8 1000 USD against 76.65 1000 USD in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Saint Lucia and Timor-Leste?
- 45.15 1000 USD, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Timor-Leste?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Saint Lucia and Timor-Leste rank globally for urea — import value?
- Saint Lucia ranks 164th and Timor-Leste ranks 161st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf