Belarus vs Italy: Urea — Production

Belarus
762,831 t
in 2020
Italy
572,801 t
in 2024
Belarus rank
20th
Italy rank
23rd

Urea — Production over time

  • Belarus
  • Italy
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M200220132024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 762,831 t against 572,801 t in Italy, a difference of 190,030 t.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Italy's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 20th and Italy ranks 23rd of 78 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Italy Difference Ahead
2000s 848,598 t 287,057 t 561,541 t Belarus
2010s 998,851 t 194,026 t 804,825 t Belarus
2020s 762,831 t 643,562 t 119,269 t Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — production, Belarus or Italy?
Belarus, at 762,831 t against 572,801 t in Italy as of 2020.
What is the difference in urea — production between Belarus and Italy?
190,030 t, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Italy?
11 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Italy rank globally for urea — production?
Belarus ranks 20th and Italy ranks 23rd of 78 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
79 places, 1,043 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf