Antigua and Barbuda vs Lesotho: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0008 million SLC per person
in 2024
Lesotho
0.0007 million SLC per person
in 2024
Antigua and Barbuda rank
120th
Lesotho rank
122nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Lesotho
0.0010.0010.0010.0010.002197019972024

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.0008 million SLC per person against 0.0007 million SLC per person in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0001 million SLC per person.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Lesotho ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 120th and Lesotho ranks 122nd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 3 and Lesotho in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Lesotho Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0007 million SLC per person 0.0011 million SLC per person 0.0004 million SLC per person Lesotho
1980s 0.0005 million SLC per person 0.0008 million SLC per person 0.0003 million SLC per person Lesotho
1990s 0.0006 million SLC per person 0.0006 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person Lesotho
2000s 0.0006 million SLC per person 0.0006 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.0006 million SLC per person 0.0006 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.0008 million SLC per person 0.0007 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Antigua and Barbuda or Lesotho?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.0008 million SLC per person against 0.0007 million SLC per person in Lesotho as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Antigua and Barbuda and Lesotho?
0.0001 million SLC per person, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Lesotho?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Lesotho rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 120th and Lesotho ranks 122nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Lesotho: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/antigua-and-barbuda/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/antigua-and-barbuda/lesotho/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Lesotho: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.