Aruba vs San Marino: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Aruba
0 million SLC per person
in 2024
San Marino
0 million SLC per person
in 2024
Aruba rank
179th
San Marino rank
180th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Aruba
  • San Marino
00000197019972024

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0 million SLC per person against 0 million SLC per person in San Marino, a difference of 0 million SLC per person.

That makes Aruba's figure about 2.7 times San Marino's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was San Marino ahead.

Aruba ranks 179th and San Marino ranks 180th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and San Marino in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba San Marino Difference Ahead
1970s 0 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person San Marino
1980s 0 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person San Marino
1990s 0 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person San Marino
2000s 0 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person San Marino
2010s 0 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person Aruba
2020s 0 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Aruba or San Marino?
Aruba, at 0 million SLC per person against 0 million SLC per person in San Marino as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Aruba and San Marino?
0 million SLC per person, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and San Marino?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Aruba and San Marino rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Aruba ranks 179th and San Marino ranks 180th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs San Marino: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/aruba/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/aruba/san-marino/">Aruba vs San Marino: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.