Australia vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Australia
0.0022 million SLC per person
in 2024
New Zealand
0.0024 million SLC per person
in 2024
Australia rank
95th
New Zealand rank
94th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Australia
  • New Zealand
00.0010.0020.003197019972024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0024 million SLC per person against 0.0022 million SLC per person in Australia, a difference of 0.0002 million SLC per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Zealand ahead.

Australia ranks 95th and New Zealand ranks 94th of 180 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0013 million SLC per person 0.0016 million SLC per person 0.0004 million SLC per person New Zealand
1980s 0.0013 million SLC per person 0.0019 million SLC per person 0.0006 million SLC per person New Zealand
1990s 0.0015 million SLC per person 0.0023 million SLC per person 0.0008 million SLC per person New Zealand
2000s 0.0018 million SLC per person 0.0024 million SLC per person 0.0007 million SLC per person New Zealand
2010s 0.0017 million SLC per person 0.0024 million SLC per person 0.0006 million SLC per person New Zealand
2020s 0.0019 million SLC per person 0.0024 million SLC per person 0.0004 million SLC per person New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Australia or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.0024 million SLC per person against 0.0022 million SLC per person in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Australia and New Zealand?
0.0002 million SLC per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Australia ranks 95th and New Zealand ranks 94th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/australia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/australia/new-zealand/">Australia vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.