British Virgin Islands vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

British Virgin Islands
0 million SLC per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0.0001 million SLC per person
in 2024
British Virgin Islands rank
178th
South Sudan rank
175th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • British Virgin Islands
  • South Sudan
000197019972024

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 0.0001 million SLC per person against 0 million SLC per person in British Virgin Islands, a difference of 0.0001 million SLC per person.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.9 times British Virgin Islands's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was South Sudan ahead.

British Virgin Islands ranks 178th and South Sudan ranks 175th of 180 countries.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade British Virgin Islands South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person South Sudan
2010s 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person South Sudan
2020s 0 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, British Virgin Islands or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 0.0001 million SLC per person against 0 million SLC per person in British Virgin Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between British Virgin Islands and South Sudan?
0.0001 million SLC per person, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and South Sudan?
17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
How do British Virgin Islands and South Sudan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
British Virgin Islands ranks 178th and South Sudan ranks 175th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

British Virgin Islands vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/british-virgin-islands/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/british-virgin-islands/south-sudan/">British Virgin Islands vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.