Burkina Faso vs Equatorial Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Burkina Faso
0.083 million SLC per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
0.0828 million SLC per person
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
39th
Equatorial Guinea rank
40th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Equatorial Guinea
0.050.10.150.2197019972024

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0.083 million SLC per person against 0.0828 million SLC per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0002 million SLC per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 39th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th of 180 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0617 million SLC per person 0.1689 million SLC per person 0.1071 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0562 million SLC per person 0.1719 million SLC per person 0.1157 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0726 million SLC per person 0.1435 million SLC per person 0.0708 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0832 million SLC per person 0.1055 million SLC per person 0.0223 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0857 million SLC per person 0.091 million SLC per person 0.0054 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.079 million SLC per person 0.0804 million SLC per person 0.0014 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Burkina Faso or Equatorial Guinea?
Burkina Faso, at 0.083 million SLC per person against 0.0828 million SLC per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0002 million SLC per person, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Burkina Faso ranks 39th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Equatorial Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/burkina-faso/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/burkina-faso/equatorial-guinea/">Burkina Faso vs Equatorial Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.