Central African Republic vs Congo: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Central African Republic
0.0945 million SLC per person
in 2024
Congo
0.0912 million SLC per person
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
36th
Congo rank
37th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Congo
00.050.10.15197019972024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.0945 million SLC per person against 0.0912 million SLC per person in Congo, a difference of 0.0033 million SLC per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Congo ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 36th and Congo ranks 37th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Congo Difference Ahead
1970s 0.112 million SLC per person 0.1344 million SLC per person 0.0224 million SLC per person Congo
1980s 0.1202 million SLC per person 0.1443 million SLC per person 0.0242 million SLC per person Congo
1990s 0.119 million SLC per person 0.095 million SLC per person 0.024 million SLC per person Central African Republic
2000s 0.1204 million SLC per person 0.084 million SLC per person 0.0364 million SLC per person Central African Republic
2010s 0.0862 million SLC per person 0.0865 million SLC per person 0.0003 million SLC per person Congo
2020s 0.0881 million SLC per person 0.0897 million SLC per person 0.0016 million SLC per person Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Central African Republic or Congo?
Central African Republic, at 0.0945 million SLC per person against 0.0912 million SLC per person in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Central African Republic and Congo?
0.0033 million SLC per person, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Congo?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Congo rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Central African Republic ranks 36th and Congo ranks 37th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Congo: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/central-african-republic/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/central-african-republic/congo-rep/">Central African Republic vs Congo: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.