Chile vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Chile
0.3482 million SLC per person
in 2024
Iceland
0.3805 million SLC per person
in 2024
Chile rank
14th
Iceland rank
11th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Chile
  • Iceland
00.20.40.6197019972024

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.3805 million SLC per person against 0.3482 million SLC per person in Chile, a difference of 0.0323 million SLC per person.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Chile ranks 14th and Iceland ranks 11th of 180 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0779 million SLC per person 0.4199 million SLC per person 0.342 million SLC per person Iceland
1980s 0.0977 million SLC per person 0.5085 million SLC per person 0.4108 million SLC per person Iceland
1990s 0.1602 million SLC per person 0.4945 million SLC per person 0.3343 million SLC per person Iceland
2000s 0.2445 million SLC per person 0.4147 million SLC per person 0.1703 million SLC per person Iceland
2010s 0.3293 million SLC per person 0.363 million SLC per person 0.0336 million SLC per person Iceland
2020s 0.3347 million SLC per person 0.3881 million SLC per person 0.0533 million SLC per person Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Chile or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0.3805 million SLC per person against 0.3482 million SLC per person in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Chile and Iceland?
0.0323 million SLC per person, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iceland?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Chile and Iceland rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Chile ranks 14th and Iceland ranks 11th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/chile/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/chile/iceland/">Chile vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.