Kenya vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Kenya
0.0296 million SLC per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0369 million SLC per person
in 2024
Kenya rank
52nd
Pakistan rank
51st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Kenya
  • Pakistan
00.010.020.030.04197019972024

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.0369 million SLC per person against 0.0296 million SLC per person in Kenya, a difference of 0.0073 million SLC per person.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Kenya's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Kenya ahead.

Kenya ranks 52nd and Pakistan ranks 51st of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 0.03 million SLC per person 0.0226 million SLC per person 0.0074 million SLC per person Kenya
1980s 0.0311 million SLC per person 0.0225 million SLC per person 0.0086 million SLC per person Kenya
1990s 0.0278 million SLC per person 0.0257 million SLC per person 0.0021 million SLC per person Kenya
2000s 0.0271 million SLC per person 0.0313 million SLC per person 0.0043 million SLC per person Pakistan
2010s 0.028 million SLC per person 0.0322 million SLC per person 0.0042 million SLC per person Pakistan
2020s 0.0287 million SLC per person 0.035 million SLC per person 0.0063 million SLC per person Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Kenya or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 0.0369 million SLC per person against 0.0296 million SLC per person in Kenya as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Kenya and Pakistan?
0.0073 million SLC per person, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Pakistan?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Kenya and Pakistan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Kenya ranks 52nd and Pakistan ranks 51st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/kenya/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/kenya/pakistan/">Kenya vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.