New Zealand vs Saudi Arabia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

New Zealand
0.0024 million SLC per person
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
0.0026 million SLC per person
in 2024
New Zealand rank
94th
Saudi Arabia rank
93rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • New Zealand
  • Saudi Arabia
00.0010.0020.003197019972024

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.0026 million SLC per person against 0.0024 million SLC per person in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0002 million SLC per person.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

New Zealand ranks 94th and Saudi Arabia ranks 93rd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0016 million SLC per person 0.0021 million SLC per person 0.0005 million SLC per person Saudi Arabia
1980s 0.0019 million SLC per person 0.0027 million SLC per person 0.0008 million SLC per person Saudi Arabia
1990s 0.0023 million SLC per person 0.0031 million SLC per person 0.0008 million SLC per person Saudi Arabia
2000s 0.0024 million SLC per person 0.0024 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person New Zealand
2010s 0.0024 million SLC per person 0.0024 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person Saudi Arabia
2020s 0.0024 million SLC per person 0.0026 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, New Zealand or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 0.0026 million SLC per person against 0.0024 million SLC per person in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between New Zealand and Saudi Arabia?
0.0002 million SLC per person, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Saudi Arabia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Saudi Arabia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
New Zealand ranks 94th and Saudi Arabia ranks 93rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Saudi Arabia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/new-zealand/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/new-zealand/saudi-arabia/">New Zealand vs Saudi Arabia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.