New Zealand vs Sierra Leone: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

New Zealand
0.0024 million SLC per person
in 2024
Sierra Leone
0.0018 million SLC per person
in 2024
New Zealand rank
94th
Sierra Leone rank
97th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • New Zealand
  • Sierra Leone
0.0010.0020.0020.003197019972024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0024 million SLC per person against 0.0018 million SLC per person in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.0006 million SLC per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Sierra Leone's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

New Zealand ranks 94th and Sierra Leone ranks 97th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Sierra Leone in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0016 million SLC per person 0.0018 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person Sierra Leone
1980s 0.0019 million SLC per person 0.002 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person Sierra Leone
1990s 0.0023 million SLC per person 0.0015 million SLC per person 0.0008 million SLC per person New Zealand
2000s 0.0024 million SLC per person 0.0014 million SLC per person 0.0011 million SLC per person New Zealand
2010s 0.0024 million SLC per person 0.0018 million SLC per person 0.0006 million SLC per person New Zealand
2020s 0.0024 million SLC per person 0.0018 million SLC per person 0.0005 million SLC per person New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, New Zealand or Sierra Leone?
New Zealand, at 0.0024 million SLC per person against 0.0018 million SLC per person in Sierra Leone as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between New Zealand and Sierra Leone?
0.0006 million SLC per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sierra Leone?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Sierra Leone rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
New Zealand ranks 94th and Sierra Leone ranks 97th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Sierra Leone: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/new-zealand/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/new-zealand/sierra-leone/">New Zealand vs Sierra Leone: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.