Pakistan vs Uruguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Pakistan
0.0369 million SLC per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0.0369 million SLC per person
in 2024
Pakistan rank
51st
Uruguay rank
50th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Pakistan
  • Uruguay
00.010.020.030.04197019972024

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.0369 million SLC per person against 0.0369 million SLC per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0 million SLC per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 51st and Uruguay ranks 50th of 180 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Uruguay Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0226 million SLC per person 0.0168 million SLC per person 0.0058 million SLC per person Pakistan
1980s 0.0225 million SLC per person 0.0181 million SLC per person 0.0044 million SLC per person Pakistan
1990s 0.0257 million SLC per person 0.0211 million SLC per person 0.0046 million SLC per person Pakistan
2000s 0.0313 million SLC per person 0.0227 million SLC per person 0.0087 million SLC per person Pakistan
2010s 0.0322 million SLC per person 0.03 million SLC per person 0.0022 million SLC per person Pakistan
2020s 0.035 million SLC per person 0.0327 million SLC per person 0.0023 million SLC per person Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Pakistan or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.0369 million SLC per person against 0.0369 million SLC per person in Pakistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Pakistan and Uruguay?
0 million SLC per person, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Uruguay?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Pakistan and Uruguay rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Pakistan ranks 51st and Uruguay ranks 50th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Uruguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/pakistan/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/pakistan/uruguay/">Pakistan vs Uruguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.