Peru vs South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Peru
0.0016 million SLC per person
in 2024
South Africa
0.0017 million SLC per person
in 2024
Peru rank
104th
South Africa rank
102nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Peru
  • South Africa
0.0010.0010.0020.002197019972024

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.0017 million SLC per person against 0.0016 million SLC per person in Peru, a difference of 0.0001 million SLC per person.

Across all 55 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Peru ranks 104th and South Africa ranks 102nd of 180 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0009 million SLC per person 0.0018 million SLC per person 0.0009 million SLC per person South Africa
1980s 0.0008 million SLC per person 0.0016 million SLC per person 0.0008 million SLC per person South Africa
1990s 0.0008 million SLC per person 0.0014 million SLC per person 0.0006 million SLC per person South Africa
2000s 0.0011 million SLC per person 0.0015 million SLC per person 0.0004 million SLC per person South Africa
2010s 0.0014 million SLC per person 0.0017 million SLC per person 0.0003 million SLC per person South Africa
2020s 0.0016 million SLC per person 0.002 million SLC per person 0.0004 million SLC per person South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Peru or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0.0017 million SLC per person against 0.0016 million SLC per person in Peru as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Peru and South Africa?
0.0001 million SLC per person, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Peru ranks 104th and South Africa ranks 102nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/peru/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/peru/south-africa/">Peru vs South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.