Turks and Caicos Islands vs Palestine: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0001 million SLC per person
in 2024
Palestine
0.0001 million SLC per person
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
173rd
Palestine rank
171st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Palestine
0000197019972024

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.0001 million SLC per person against 0.0001 million SLC per person in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 million SLC per person.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.9 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 173rd and Palestine ranks 171st of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Turks and Caicos Islands averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turks and Caicos Islands Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0003 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0003 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0003 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person Palestine
2020s 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Turks and Caicos Islands or Palestine?
Palestine, at 0.0001 million SLC per person against 0.0001 million SLC per person in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Turks and Caicos Islands and Palestine?
0 million SLC per person, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Palestine?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Palestine rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 173rd and Palestine ranks 171st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs Palestine: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/turks-and-caicos-islands/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/turks-and-caicos-islands/west-bank-and-gaza/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs Palestine: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.