Madagascar vs Myanmar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Madagascar
0.0006 million SLC per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Myanmar
0.0003 million SLC per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Madagascar rank
7th
Myanmar rank
10th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Madagascar
  • Myanmar
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005197019972024

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 0.0006 million SLC per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 million SLC per US$ of GDP in Myanmar, a difference of 0.0003 million SLC per US$ of GDP.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 2.1 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Myanmar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 7th and Myanmar ranks 10th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 4 and Myanmar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Myanmar Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0026 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0.0035 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0.0009 million SLC per US$ of GDP Myanmar
1980s 0.0013 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0.0033 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0.002 million SLC per US$ of GDP Myanmar
1990s 0.0016 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0.0014 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0.0002 million SLC per US$ of GDP Madagascar
2000s 0.0012 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0.0009 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0.0003 million SLC per US$ of GDP Madagascar
2010s 0.0007 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0.0003 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0.0004 million SLC per US$ of GDP Madagascar
2020s 0.0006 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0.0003 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0.0003 million SLC per US$ of GDP Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Madagascar or Myanmar?
Madagascar, at 0.0006 million SLC per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 million SLC per US$ of GDP in Myanmar as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Madagascar and Myanmar?
0.0003 million SLC per US$ of GDP, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Myanmar?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Madagascar and Myanmar rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Madagascar ranks 7th and Myanmar ranks 10th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Myanmar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-3/madagascar/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-3/madagascar/myanmar/">Madagascar vs Myanmar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit
million SLC per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,833 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.