Angola vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Angola
1.31 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
1.52 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
60th
Iceland rank
58th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Angola
  • Iceland
00.511.5197019962023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 1.52 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.31 million SLC per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.21 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Angola's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 60th and Iceland ranks 58th of 180 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.3976 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9061 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5085 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.3934 million SLC per square kilometre 1.22 million SLC per square kilometre 0.8264 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.2694 million SLC per square kilometre 1.31 million SLC per square kilometre 1.04 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.4571 million SLC per square kilometre 1.23 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7746 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.9137 million SLC per square kilometre 1.21 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2931 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 1.22 million SLC per square kilometre 1.46 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2383 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Angola or Iceland?
Iceland, at 1.52 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.31 million SLC per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Angola and Iceland?
0.21 million SLC per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Angola and Iceland rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Angola ranks 60th and Iceland ranks 58th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/angola/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/angola/iceland/">Angola vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.