Aruba vs British Virgin Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time
- Aruba
- British Virgin Islands
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.008 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0068 million SLC per square kilometre in British Virgin Islands, a difference of 0.0012 million SLC per square kilometre.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.2 times British Virgin Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was British Virgin Islands ahead.
Aruba ranks 166th and British Virgin Islands ranks 169th of 180 countries.
British Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | British Virgin Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0004 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0042 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0038 million SLC per square kilometre | British Virgin Islands |
| 1980s | 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0049 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0039 million SLC per square kilometre | British Virgin Islands |
| 1990s | 0.0022 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.012 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0098 million SLC per square kilometre | British Virgin Islands |
| 2000s | 0.0034 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.012 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0086 million SLC per square kilometre | British Virgin Islands |
| 2010s | 0.0057 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.011 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0054 million SLC per square kilometre | British Virgin Islands |
| 2020s | 0.0071 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0078 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0006 million SLC per square kilometre | British Virgin Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Aruba or British Virgin Islands?
- Aruba, at 0.008 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0068 million SLC per square kilometre in British Virgin Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Aruba and British Virgin Islands?
- 0.0012 million SLC per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and British Virgin Islands?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and British Virgin Islands rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Aruba ranks 166th and British Virgin Islands ranks 169th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.