Aruba vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Aruba
0.008 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
166th
Zambia rank
165th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Aruba
  • Zambia
00.0050.010.015197019962023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.008 million SLC per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0.0031 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.4 times Aruba's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 166th and Zambia ranks 165th of 180 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0004 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0086 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0081 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0095 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0084 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.0022 million SLC per square kilometre 0.013 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0108 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.0034 million SLC per square kilometre 0.014 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0106 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0057 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0128 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0071 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0071 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0133 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0062 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Aruba or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.008 million SLC per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Aruba and Zambia?
0.0031 million SLC per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Zambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Zambia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Aruba ranks 166th and Zambia ranks 165th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/aruba/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/aruba/zambia/">Aruba vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.