Austria vs Spain: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Austria
0.0535 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain
0.0539 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
130th
Spain rank
129th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Austria
  • Spain
00.020.040.06197019962023

How they compare

Spain currently reports 0.0539 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0535 million SLC per square kilometre in Austria, a difference of 0.0004 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 130th and Spain ranks 129th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Spain in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Spain Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0342 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0273 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0069 million SLC per square kilometre Austria
1980s 0.0362 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0323 million SLC per square kilometre 0.004 million SLC per square kilometre Austria
1990s 0.0402 million SLC per square kilometre 0.043 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0028 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
2000s 0.0453 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0519 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0066 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
2010s 0.049 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0575 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0085 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
2020s 0.0521 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0569 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0047 million SLC per square kilometre Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Austria or Spain?
Spain, at 0.0539 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0535 million SLC per square kilometre in Austria as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Austria and Spain?
0.0004 million SLC per square kilometre, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Spain?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Austria and Spain rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Austria ranks 130th and Spain ranks 129th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Spain: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/austria/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/austria/spain/">Austria vs Spain: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.