Bahamas vs Botswana: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Bahamas
0.0065 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana
0.0054 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
172nd
Botswana rank
174th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Bahamas
  • Botswana
00.0050.010.015197019962023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 0.0065 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0054 million SLC per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 172nd and Botswana ranks 174th of 180 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Botswana Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0067 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0035 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0032 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 0.0105 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0035 million SLC per square kilometre 0.007 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 0.0132 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0047 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0085 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 0.0141 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0043 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0097 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.0102 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0051 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0051 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.0061 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0054 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0008 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Bahamas or Botswana?
Bahamas, at 0.0065 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0054 million SLC per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Bahamas and Botswana?
0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Botswana?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Botswana rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Bahamas ranks 172nd and Botswana ranks 174th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Botswana: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/bahamas-the/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/bahamas-the/botswana/">Bahamas vs Botswana: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.