Barbados vs Bhutan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Barbados
0.4477 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan
0.5267 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
77th
Bhutan rank
74th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Barbados
  • Bhutan
00.20.40.6197019962023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.5267 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.4477 million SLC per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.079 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.2 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 77th and Bhutan ranks 74th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Bhutan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Bhutan Difference Ahead
1970s 0.5187 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1118 million SLC per square kilometre 0.407 million SLC per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 0.4978 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1907 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3071 million SLC per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 0.4061 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2838 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1222 million SLC per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.3737 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3441 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0296 million SLC per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.5017 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4378 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0639 million SLC per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.514 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5225 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0084 million SLC per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Barbados or Bhutan?
Bhutan, at 0.5267 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.4477 million SLC per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Barbados and Bhutan?
0.079 million SLC per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Bhutan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Bhutan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Barbados ranks 77th and Bhutan ranks 74th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Bhutan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/barbados/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/barbados/bhutan/">Barbados vs Bhutan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.