Belarus vs Croatia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Belarus
0.0308 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia
0.0313 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
150th
Croatia rank
149th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Belarus
  • Croatia
00.010.020.030.04199220072023

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0.0313 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0308 million SLC per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0005 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.

Belarus ranks 150th and Croatia ranks 149th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Croatia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Croatia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0173 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0313 million SLC per square kilometre 0.014 million SLC per square kilometre Croatia
2000s 0.0201 million SLC per square kilometre 0.034 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0139 million SLC per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 0.0284 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0273 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0308 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0301 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0008 million SLC per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Belarus or Croatia?
Croatia, at 0.0313 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0308 million SLC per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Belarus and Croatia?
0.0005 million SLC per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Croatia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Croatia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Belarus ranks 150th and Croatia ranks 149th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Croatia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/belarus/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/belarus/croatia/">Belarus vs Croatia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.