Belarus vs Papua New Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time
- Belarus
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.0308 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0283 million SLC per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0025 million SLC per square kilometre.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 150th and Papua New Guinea ranks 152nd of 180 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0173 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0147 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0026 million SLC per square kilometre | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0.0201 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0181 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.002 million SLC per square kilometre | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0.0284 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0233 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0051 million SLC per square kilometre | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.0308 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0273 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0035 million SLC per square kilometre | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Belarus or Papua New Guinea?
- Belarus, at 0.0308 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0283 million SLC per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Belarus and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.0025 million SLC per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Papua New Guinea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Papua New Guinea rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Belarus ranks 150th and Papua New Guinea ranks 152nd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.