Belarus vs Slovenia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Belarus
0.0308 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovenia
0.0344 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
150th
Slovenia rank
147th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Belarus
  • Slovenia
00.010.020.030.04199220072023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 0.0344 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0308 million SLC per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0036 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 150th and Slovenia ranks 147th of 180 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0173 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0347 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0174 million SLC per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 0.0201 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0365 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0164 million SLC per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 0.0284 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0358 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0074 million SLC per square kilometre Slovenia
2020s 0.0308 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0369 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0061 million SLC per square kilometre Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Belarus or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 0.0344 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0308 million SLC per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Belarus and Slovenia?
0.0036 million SLC per square kilometre, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Slovenia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Slovenia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Belarus ranks 150th and Slovenia ranks 147th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Slovenia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/belarus/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/belarus/slovenia/">Belarus vs Slovenia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.