Belgium vs South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Belgium
0.0928 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
0.0969 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
114th
South Africa rank
112th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Belgium
  • South Africa
0.040.060.080.10.12197019962023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.0969 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0928 million SLC per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 0.0041 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 114th and South Africa ranks 112th of 180 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0731 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0614 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0117 million SLC per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 0.0924 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0805 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0119 million SLC per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 0.0911 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1046 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0135 million SLC per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Belgium or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0.0969 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0928 million SLC per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Belgium and South Africa?
0.0041 million SLC per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and South Africa?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and South Africa rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Belgium ranks 114th and South Africa ranks 112th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/belgium/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/belgium/south-africa/">Belgium vs South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.