Bhutan vs Guatemala: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Bhutan
0.5267 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.5342 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
74th
Guatemala rank
73rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Bhutan
  • Guatemala
0.10.20.30.40.5197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.5342 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.5267 million SLC per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0075 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guatemala ahead.

Bhutan ranks 74th and Guatemala ranks 73rd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 5 and Guatemala in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Guatemala Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1118 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1563 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0445 million SLC per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.1907 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1896 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.2838 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2437 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0401 million SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 0.3441 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3237 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0204 million SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 0.4378 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4348 million SLC per square kilometre 0.003 million SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.5225 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5133 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0092 million SLC per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Bhutan or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.5342 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.5267 million SLC per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Bhutan and Guatemala?
0.0075 million SLC per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Guatemala?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Guatemala rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Bhutan ranks 74th and Guatemala ranks 73rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Guatemala: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/bhutan/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/bhutan/guatemala/">Bhutan vs Guatemala: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.