Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Slovenia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0355 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovenia
0.0344 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
146th
Slovenia rank
147th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Slovenia
00.010.020.030.04199220072023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.0355 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0344 million SLC per square kilometre in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 146th and Slovenia ranks 147th of 180 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0279 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0347 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0068 million SLC per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 0.0328 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0365 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0037 million SLC per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 0.0349 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0358 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0009 million SLC per square kilometre Slovenia
2020s 0.0363 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0369 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0006 million SLC per square kilometre Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Slovenia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.0355 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0344 million SLC per square kilometre in Slovenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia?
0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 146th and Slovenia ranks 147th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Slovenia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/bosnia-and-herzegovina/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/bosnia-and-herzegovina/slovenia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Slovenia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.