Brazil vs Ecuador: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Brazil
0.0409 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0.0408 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
139th
Ecuador rank
140th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Brazil
  • Ecuador
0.010.020.030.04197019962023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.0409 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0408 million SLC per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 139th and Ecuador ranks 140th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 5 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0073 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0062 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.0109 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0074 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0035 million SLC per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.0133 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0126 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0008 million SLC per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 0.022 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0199 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0021 million SLC per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.0302 million SLC per square kilometre 0.03 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0002 million SLC per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.0368 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0385 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Brazil or Ecuador?
Brazil, at 0.0409 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0408 million SLC per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Brazil and Ecuador?
0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Ecuador?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Ecuador rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Brazil ranks 139th and Ecuador ranks 140th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Ecuador: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/brazil/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/brazil/ecuador/">Brazil vs Ecuador: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.