Burkina Faso vs Nepal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Burkina Faso
6.44 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
5.63 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
36th
Nepal rank
38th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Nepal
246197019962023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 6.44 million SLC per square kilometre against 5.63 million SLC per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 0.81 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nepal ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 36th and Nepal ranks 38th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 4 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Nepal Difference Ahead
1970s 1.38 million SLC per square kilometre 1.4 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0196 million SLC per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 1.63 million SLC per square kilometre 1.71 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0723 million SLC per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 2.76 million SLC per square kilometre 2.33 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4239 million SLC per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2000s 4.18 million SLC per square kilometre 3.23 million SLC per square kilometre 0.958 million SLC per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 5.8 million SLC per square kilometre 4.42 million SLC per square kilometre 1.38 million SLC per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 6.34 million SLC per square kilometre 5.42 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9228 million SLC per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Burkina Faso or Nepal?
Burkina Faso, at 6.44 million SLC per square kilometre against 5.63 million SLC per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Burkina Faso and Nepal?
0.81 million SLC per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Nepal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Nepal rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Burkina Faso ranks 36th and Nepal ranks 38th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Nepal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/burkina-faso/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/burkina-faso/nepal/">Burkina Faso vs Nepal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.